This one needs no words

This is hilarious: Dalai (Dalie) Lama and his land rover

The short article is found here. Not sure what the author’s intention was, but it’s fun. I believe my readers, if there’s still any, deserve a break.

 

 

Dalai(Dalie) fights for “free Tibet”? The biggest fraud ever existed

Hey, another one about Dalai (Dalie), this one by National Geographic

Better than Communism? 

Let us all send such a message to the local government

Condemn the violence before talking about the rest

Disregarding your opinions toward the independence movement of Tibet, it has become clear to everyone at this moment that horrible violence was committed by the rioters in Lhasa. They stabbed people to death and burnt down houses, with civilians trapped inside.

It must be self-evident to the civilized world that violence should never be tolerated as a step toward any solution. If such horrible things happened any where else, the very first thing a responsible government must do is to condemn the violence. Only after that, one can talk about the rest, such as the government restraint and peaceful solutions.

We, however, have yet to see any government of the western countries, including XXX, publicly, unconditionally and unambiguously condemn the violence broke out in Lhasa. Instead, they all jumped right into the second step asking Chinese government to “show restraint”. We believe that such an intentional omission is against the conscience of everyone and morally inexcusible. While violence on the street is sympathized or even encouraged, asking the local government to “show restraint” is only hypocritical and promoting mistrust.

In view of that, we Chinese overseas, united together, strongly urge Mr. XXX to publicly, unconditionally and unambiguously condemn the violence carried out by the rioters. Because before this has been done, you have no moral authority of speaking out for anything, including democracy and human rights in China.  

Just another lie

From the article to which I provided the link below, there is another interesting piece of information:  

Both the Dalai Lama and his advisor and youngest brother, Tendzin Choegyal, claimed that “more than 1.2 million Tibetans are dead as a result of the Chinese occupation.” The official 1953 census–six years before the Chinese crackdown–recorded the entire population residing in Tibet at 1,274,000. Other census counts put the population within Tibet at about two million. If the Chinese killed 1.2 million in the early 1960s then almost all of Tibet, would have been depopulated, transformed into a killing field dotted with death camps and mass graves–of which we have no evidence. The thinly distributed Chinese force in Tibet could not have rounded up, hunted down, and exterminated that many people even if it had spent all its time doing nothing else.

Some may say, why are you showing so much disrespect toward Dalie Lame (Dalai Lama). One should respect him at least as a religious leader, shouldn’t he? I say: “the hell religious leader”. This man was a young ambitious dictator who struggled against the central Chinese government for his dream of kingship. Failed to find local supports, he became the best friend of CIA, spread rumors about China, trained insurgents and then smuggled them back into Tibet with the hope that they would bring him back to his grand palace. Only until middle 1970’s, his American support was cut off. As he described it himself, he felt angry and “betrayed”. Not a big surprise, is it? Anyone, who participates as a chess piece in foreign powers’ agenda against his own country, is bound to be betrayed sooner or later. I’m sure he must have had a very bad time, until finally he got the new idea. Hey, how about a “peaceful solution for Tibetans’ self-ruling”? That sounds like something would sell. To most westerners, the keywords are enough. How many of his supporters actually find out what kind of solutions he presented to Beijing? Those are full of craps. To start with, he asks for a territory at least 100% larger than the current Tibet region. Does this exhibit any sincerity toward reaching a solution at all? Now he is claiming that he’s “virtually powerless to stop the violence in Tibet”. If that’s the case, go resign. Don’t do it in words, but in action.

The point is, one can only switch his political stance so many times. I am glad that some of the radical Tibetan extremists are questioning his “moderate” route and even his leadership now. Those so called Tibetans, 2nd or 3rd generations of the Tibetan-in-exile, grew up in the west, speak English better than Tibetan, and have never lived in Tibet until their “government” send them there “for business”. They drink Coca-Cola, eat french fry, watch cartoon and play PS3, and meanwhile, they don’t forget to cry:”we don’t have any freedom! We must go back to fight the evil!”. Those are the rotten generations. The moment they abandon this old cunning  man, we are left with a much easier problem to solve.

Another more honest acount by a westerner

Apparently not all the westerners are fully ignorant on the issue of Tibet.  Here is another well written article by some one who actually studied it seriously.  I wouldn’t totally agree with him on the part of the future of Tibet, but at least he got the past mostly right, quite consistent with my own little brief history. Again, we can always discuss the future even if we hold different views, but never based on lying about the past.

Update: A friend pointed out to me that according to this man’s career records, he might be a “crackpot”. This to me only seems more interesting and more worthy paying attention to. If people who actually know about things and speak for the truth are marginalized in his career, it’s says something about the community, because I do recall some “professors” from reputable institutes, supposedly the western experts on the Tibet/China issues, uttering words full of ignorance quite a few times.

 

If you are looking for some details

My friend sent me a link to a seemingly professionally written and detailed article on all the truth (maybe) of the past Tibet as well as the diplomatic strategy of the so called government of Tibet in exile, named as the Shadow of Dalai Lama, although I can’t yet endorse its contents. I myself planned to read it and may share with you some most interesting bits in the hopefully not too far future. Meanwhile, you are all encouraged to read it and pass it on.

A brief history of Tibet in 1950-1959

Readers of my blog should be well aware by now of the autonomous regime headed by Dalie (Dalai) was one of the most brutal regimes around the world, where the properties of the entire Tibet was in the hands of some 5% of the population, and the rest, 95% of them, were virtually slaves (serfs). Their spiritual leader was smart enough to understand that “spirit” wasn’t sufficient to maintain such an unequal system, so he ruled Tibet by keeping most Tibetans in ignorance and terror. Take the eye gouging penalty for the “freedom-loving” criminals as an example.

So, what happened really from 1950 to 1959? If you care, there are plenty of resources to dig out online. But to an average people, which by definition is lazy, I can give you a very brief account of it.

Before 1950, when the Republic of China was shaking, both Britain and Russia attempted to control Tibet. Fearing an independent Tibet can easily fall in the hand of the other, neither pushed Tibet hard toward independence, although they both tried.

Between 1946 and 1950, the Communism party astonished the west by diminishing the armies of the Republic of China at an extraordinary speed. Out of the panic, British and CIA encouraged Dalie Lame (Dalai Lama) to declare independence. Whether he officially made such a bid mattered little since the message hardly got across much further than the outskirts of his palace. When the Communists army “marched into Tibet” as many western media love to describe it, the very same way they marched into every other province of China (hey dude, keep in mind that we were in a civil war and armies of different kinds marched everywhere!), they met very little local resistance. After all, average Tibetan would be more than confused to be asked to resist, since they had also been told for centuries to worship the emperor of China as the “living buddha” of higher rank than Dalie (Dalai). Foreseeing the failure of their poorly planned independence movement, the British packed up and went home, leaving Dalie alone to cooperate with Beijing.

After 1950. Initially he was allowed to maintain his autonomous regime as was. Only this time, the central Chinese government had a very different nature. They were the damn passionate communists, who perceived landlords as devils. They found the presence of a slavery regime in a socialism republic very bizarre.  All other landlords in China were wiped out, often in a brutal way. So, how could Dalie Lame, the biggest landlord in China at the time, be tolerated to continue his ruling in Tibet by brutality and terror? Some critics also say that Dalie wasn’t obedient enough in front of Mao and Mao looked down on Tibetan religious tradition.

Whatever the reason was, the Communists (Lincoln) believed that according to the Chinese (US) constitution, the central (the Federal) government was entitled and obligated to liberate the people in Tibet (the south), even at the cost of military action. Some time before 1959, they launched (very slowly though) a political reforming plan in Tibet. At this point, it should be clear to the “conscience of the world” (sorry, I can’t help quoting Nancy, she’s just lovely) who embraced such a reforming the most happily. It was the vast majority of the poor Tibetans. Why would anyone say no to be set free out of slavery? Are we not freedom-loving by nature? It must also be obvious who were most upset. And yes, Dalie and his priest class. Let us remember that Dalie(Dalai) at the time was an ambitious young man at age 24, who had been receiving tough education and training in his palace for more than 20 years preparing him to become the monarch. Now, all of sudden, he was told to step aside, continue being your spiritual leader but mind no politics. He had reasons to feel outrageous and the urge of fighting back.

Luckily, CIA found Tibet their another favorite dictatorship. With their help, he quickly mobilized the slave owners, who equally feared of losing their lands, and organized a resistance force. This resulted in the “bloody crackdown” of a violent “uprise” in Lhasa after a sequence of political conflicts in 1959.

To their great dismay though, a riot was the best they managed. Quickly they ran out of the momentum and failed to find sufficient local support for a full-scale civil war. Failing the struggle, CIA arranged for Dalie to flee to India, together with a large crowd of rich monks, slave owners and their close supporters.

From then on, they settled in India and created a “government of Tibet-in-exile”, where they educated their children, and the entire west by legend.

The legend goes like this. Before 1950, Tibet was a beautiful, peaceful and spiritual fairyland where people lived free and happily. It was “invaded” by the evil Chinese Communists in 1950 and Dalie was forced to exile because he “fought for the freedom of Tibetans“. Nothing can be more ironic then such a story. I’m sure, for quite a while, the slogan of “free Tibet” was a bit confusing and even scary to Dalie (Dalai) and his pals, because “free” is a cheap word but the real question is: to be freed from what? Most evidently, most Tibetans are much freer than they ever were. Didn’t Dalie himself want to keep their “tradition” by granting his people much less freedom? But CIA had their propaganda ready and provided him the best answer that fits right into the westerners’ mind. Surely it meant to be “free from the communism”, you moron! With this last piece of jigsaw, the legend had become the best selling fiction in the 20th century and still remains very popular.

Finally, some might ask, did Dalie (Dalai) stated that he had no intention to reinstall the feudal system and instead, he planned to establish a democratic government in Tibet? Well, surely he says so, but, who else that has a brain wouldn’t? He even claimed that he was willing to consider reforming before 1950.

What a holy ingenious young dictator, at his age of 15, had already become democracy loving, and at the very same time, he already knew to fight against communism, and, most important of all, he even knew to keep his fabulous dream of “free Tibet” in secracy so he wouldn’t have upset the rich powerful monks and turned them all against him. Only until he was in exile, when the CIA funding was cut off, and when some westerners, out of curiosities, discovered the horrible past of Dalie’s rule and started questioning him, he kindly revealed to the world his most democracy and human right respecting side. Bravo, two thumbs up to his holy liar! 

Updated Remark: my later study revealed to me that CIA had never taken it seriously to start a war against China for Tibetan’s independence. Their plan was only to keep the region disturbed and so the communist China troubled, although the poor Tibetans-in-exile were long kept in a myth that USA would sincerely “do everything possible” (as they so stated in one of the telegrams to Dalai Lama) for them to achieve their goal. No wonder Dalai later stated that he felt furious and betrayed when the CIA funding was cut. He, and his followers, were indeed betrayed from the very beginning. I even sympathize him and the ignorant Tibetans-in-exile now. How sad a life would it be had he not invented later the idea of becoming a “peace symbol”!

 

Call for revocation of Dalie Lame’s Nobel prize for “PEACE” of shit

Out of such an inexcusable violence, we should call upon the entire world to demand the confiscation of the Nobel prize for “PEACE” awarded to Dalie Lame for his “his commitment to non-violence in the quest for Tibetan self-rule”, which was a big joke from the very beginning. 

Wait a moment though, is there no evidence yet for his connection to the violence? Did one of the lawmakers from the country which prescribes human rights around the world said that it took an international inquiry to establish such an accusation, despite the fact that this man openly kept close ties with the leaders of the Tibetan Youth Congress which known to all participated organizations of this entire thing, and the fact that he was worshiped as both their spiritual and political leader? Oh, I see, should we simply reckon that these Tibetan extremist leaders listened to this man’s preach for a couple hours, and then turned way, went back to their normal life and carried on all their evils as usual, just like every westerner did?

But then, on the other hand, since when had we established any proof for Dalie Lame’s “commitment to non-violence” anyway, except for the big mouth of his own? I don’t recall that any international inquiry to his “commitment” was ever demanded, despite that his autonomous regime before 1950’s was one of the most brutal regimes around the world. And what about those now declassified documents proving that CIA secretly trained insurgents and then smuggled them back into Tibet? Am I supposed to swallow that his holy shittiness had definitely no knowledge of any of these things at all?

One thing nobody can deny is that this Lame must truly be a “living buddha”, because no ordinary dictator, once turned his back on Communism, could have learnt human rights and democracy from CIA overnight like a piece of cake/shit.

Talking about this, I realize that a full-scale international inquiry into the entire business of this Nobel Prize for “Peace” of shit should be of emergent importance for us all. Because, surely before any doubt on its validity is cleared out, we shall all lose our authority to speak out on human/animal rights, and, what sort of a sucking boring life would that be?!